| 1. | Fusion of the leading case law and the systematic active law of documents
论判例法与制订法的融合
|
| 2. | Rgb flashli . . led cases
Rgb手电筒,模组
|
| 3. | Ceibs case development center is a member institution of ecch , the leading case distributor in the world . at present , more than 100 ceibs cases are distributed worldwide through ecch
中欧案例研究中心是全球最大的案例交流机构欧洲案例交流中心ecch的成员，目前已有一百多篇案例通过ecch在全球发售。
|
| 4. | We will reach the essence of it in this chapter by reading the leading cases such as the merak [ 1965 ] and the annefield [ 1971 ] , which reflect the attitude of english court towards general incorporation clause and special incorporation clause ; the miramar [ 1984 ] and the rena - k [ 1978 ] , which reveal the verbal manipulation regulations on incorporated clauses from c / p ; the sannicholas [ 1976 ] , which gives resolution when the incorporation clause fails to point out the c / p meant to incorporate
本文在分析英国典型案例的基础上对这些规定逐一予以分析。首先，通过merak案、 annefield案的分析介绍英国法对一般并入条款和特别并入条款的规定；其次，通过miramar案、 renak案的分析揭示英国法对意图被并入提单的租约条款作语言调整的规定；最后，通过sannicholas案阐明英国法在并入条款未指明提单意图并入哪一份租约时的处理方式。
|
| 5. | Warranty as the most feature content in marine insurance law , has nothing provisions in cmc , which have to say it is a pity . the thesis primary discusses the warranty from the provisions in 1906mia , and studies the leading cases in the practice of british marine insurance . finally , thinks that warranty should establish warranty should establish in cmc . simultaneity . bringing forward the reasonable suggestions to the article 235 in cmc
本文即主要从1906mia对保证的规定入手进行论述，并对英国对保证规定的有关判例进行必要研究，最后认为，保证有必要在我国海商法中确立的结论，同时对中国海商法第235条提出了合理化完善建议。
|
| 6. | The other one advocated regarding the dominant , effective cause as the proximate cause . and the insurer would be responsible to the loss caused by proximate cause . in this chapter , i will try my best to show the theories of causation of different scholars , and how the principle of proximate cause is used in the leading cases
对保险人来说，他只负责赔偿承保危险作为近因所造成的损失，对于承保危险为远因造成的损失不承担赔偿责任，避免了保单项下不合理的索赔；对被保险人来说，他可以防止保险人以损失原因是远因为借口，解除保单项下的责任，不承担承保风险所造成的损失。
|
| 7. | In the leading case of hochster v . de la tour , british court created the rule of repudiation in 1853 , which allowed the victim to cancel contract and claim damages when the other party breached contract expressly . again in 1894 ' s mrs . single v . mr . single , british court established diminished expectation , allowing the victim to suspend his performance and to demand adequate assurance of the other party ' s performance if the other party breached main contract obligations , or to cancel contract and to claim damages when the other party failed to provide assurance of his performance
本章第二节对明示预期违约进行了分析，从以下三方面展开：一、明示预期违约规则的确立与发展英美法最早于1853年英国法院在审理霍切斯特诉戴?纳?陶尔案中确立了明示预期违约规则，允许预期违约的受害方当事人在对方违反合同主要义务时解除合同，并向违约方请求损害赔偿。
|
| 8. | Finally , delivery of cargo without original bills of lading promote the development of shipping in a way in practice , it has reasonability in existence . chapter three is writer ' s study for 10 leading cases of chinese maritime court and court of cassation concerning delivery of cargo without original bills of lading , writer conclude as follows : chinese courts are inclined to regard it as breach of contract but not in tort in judicial practice ; chinese courts allow the plaintiff to choose to sue in tort or of breach ; chinese courts have abandoned the viewpoint of " who holder the bills who must have the right to sue " or " who holder the bills who must win the case " ; and in many cases concerning delivery of cargo without original bills of lading , the court ignored plaintiff ' s actions against the carrier , it proved that carrier can escape reasonability of delivery of cargo without original bills of lading in some cases
第三章论述我国海事法院及其上级法院就无单放货案件审理的司法审判实践研究，通过对十个法院判例的分析、归纳，笔者认为，在司法实践中，法院越来越倾向于将无单放货纠纷视为运输合同纠纷处理，而不认定为侵权行为纠纷；法院允许原告起诉时以侵权起诉或违约起诉作出选择；法院对提单持有人的诉权认定，已经不采用“谁持有提单谁就有诉权”与“谁持有提单就能保证胜诉”的观点；有诸多的无单放货的诉讼案例以被法院驳回起诉为结局，证明了无单放货在特定情况下的合理性以及承运人有避免承担责任的可能性。
|